We including wanted to find out how chance-providing size were regarding works features thereby asked the fresh members within data to indicate about what the quantity the things they’re doing would-be characterized given that varied, risky and you can/otherwise intense. The root hypothesis try you to a general willingness to take risks will be shown when you look at the assortment of functions (Come across Zuckerman 2007 ).
Seeks and you may trick details
All of our main aim within investigation would be to most useful understand people’s standard thinking into the risk-bringing, the way they are affected by socio-group background and you can identification as well as how they are expressed in more particular risk-bringing attitudes and habits.
Penned on the web:
Q1. Exactly how may be the answers marketed on every of your exposure size? Our very own theory right here is actually one (H1) everyone is generally speaking exposure averse as well as the shipments off solutions could be skewed into the risk averse an element of the measure.
Q2. What’s the family relations within exposure dimensions and you will market parameters? Considering earlier search we expected one to (H2) guys could well be much more prepared to simply take risks than girls and you may young far more happy than just seniors. We’d zero particular hypotheses regarding other socio-demographic parameters.
Q3. What is the loved ones between your risk-delivering proportions and you can identification? According to intuitions plus prior to lookup i asked because the all of our theory (H3) you to definitely risk-delivering attitudes might possibly be certainly correlated having a great) Sensation Trying to and its subscales, that have b) Extraversion https://datingmentor.org/nl/amor-en-linea-overzicht/ and you will Psychoticism of the EPQ size and you will c) which have Extraversion and Visibility to help you the fresh new enjoy on Large Five scale.
Q4. What is the family amongst the risk proportions and you can really works characteristics? I expected here that (H4) risk-delivering perceptions was certainly synchronised with collection of work you to definitely try varied, risky and you may/or real.
Q5. What is the loved ones within chance proportions and willingness in order to participate in hazardous activities? We requested you to definitely (H5) risk-providing perceptions would-be undoubtedly connected with desire becoming energetic inside the risky sport, risky operate and risky military procedures.
Q6. Which are the primary predictors away from exposure-taking? I asked here (H6) your hypothesized personality traits also sex and you may ages are definitely the key predictors.
Matter and techniques
Research was basically compiled of the Ipsos Browse Institute, a worldwide providers with ISO9001 and you can ISO 202252 licenses. Research was basically gathered during a couple of weeks when you look at the . The newest respondents were employed from the company’s individual database, which contains every joined phone numbers in Norway, as well as cellphones. Wide variety had been selected towards a lotto foundation additionally the interviewers requested on person in the family, away from fifteen years or over, whose birthday celebration is next. To reach step one,100000 complete interviews twenty two,355 citizens were called that have all in all, 61,916 calls. Of those called nine,567 answered and you can twelve,788 don’t. A maximum of step one,100000 respondents upcoming completed the telephone interviews, and therefore endured everything to get minutes. The fresh impulse rate off people contacted try five percent and you may of individuals who responded 10%. While the reaction costs is optimally had been large, a closer examination learned that the take to found standards getting representativity towards the selected details. The very last decide to try obtained really. Age was gathered in years. For ages fifteen–twenty-four years new test attained 82% of your populace objective, 25–39 years 109%, 40–49 years ninety%, 50–59 ages 112%, 60–69 age 110%, and also for 70 + years 94%. While the shot obtained better with the many years or other records details, we could possibly underline our utilization of the phrase ‘the fresh population’ otherwise ‘new Norwegian population’ on the blog post must be taken which includes caution because of the representativity matter.